I recently downloaded one of the camera apps, which will allow you to wait a few days before you can access the photos. The delay reminded me of waiting to develop photos when I was a child and made the whole process more enjoyable. But shouldn’t I use technology to make things faster and more efficient? Am I deceiving myself by trying to live in the past in a certain way?
It is difficult to talk about the camera without talking about the time. Photography is an attempt to outsmart clocks and calendars. As the film critic André Bazin once said, this art “can be antiseptic, but save time from its proper corruption. “Even if the technology becomes more and more complex, cameras will still retain some of the characteristics of their ancestors, as if they were frozen by time. The shooting button on the phone camera app will still make a mechanical click of the physical shutter. Filters fade the image and change the color palette, mimicking the aging process that digital photos are immune to.
Having said that, I suspect that simple nostalgia caused you to download this application. If you want to enjoy the fantasy of past life, you can easily jump on eBay or go to second-hand stores, the graveyard of those analog technologies, and then pick up an old SLR. My guess is that the app is fulfilling a more specific desire, and waiting itself is the main attraction.
Of course, most of us have the opposite instinct. As we all know, even if the cost of waiting is lower or the reward is higher, people usually choose instant happiness. This cognitive bias is called “hyperbolic discounting” in behavioral economics, and it is the basis of human nature, so much so that it was dramatized in our earliest myths. (Faced with the choice between apple and eternal life in heaven, Adam and Eve chose the forbidden fruit.) If anything, the speed of contemporary life will only further weaken our ability to wait. In the late 1970s, the one-hour photography boom that coincides with the invention of the microlab is a good example of how lucrative impatience can be for those who know how to use it. It turns out that customers are willing to pay almost twice as much to develop their movies in 60 minutes instead of days. “We live in a society of instant gratification,” an early minilab owner told New York Times“We want something now.”
You impressed me, Focused, as one of those rare souls who can achieve great self-control, the kind of person who is willing to give up the $50 now offered and support the $100 promised in the future. This is a feature that is undoubtedly useful in many situations, although in the case of camera applications, there is no real advantage to delay gratification. The reward does not increase over time; you get the same photo. In a sense, your desire to wait is more unreasonable than hyperbolic discounting, and it at least has an evolutionary advantage (those who refuse to sustain life rewards may not live to see further rewards).
For people like you, I think economics and marketing psychology are not as helpful as philosophy. As early as 1930, Bertrand Russell (Bertrand Russell) pointed out that the endless stream of novelties in modern life can be annoying. He wrote: “A life of overexcitement is a life of exhaustion. In this life, increasing stimulation is needed to make the pleasure that has been considered an essential part of happiness.” Russell believes that instant gratification has been eliminated. In addition to our ability to endure boredom and idleness, these periods make happiness truly enjoyable, just as long winters increase the joy of spring. We are creatures on earth, he wrote, “The pace of life on earth is very slow; for it, autumn and winter are as important as spring and summer, and rest is as important as exercise.” Ironically, focusing on “now “In the culture of “, promise to immediately realize any whim (this guarantee is echoed in the names of the main photo-sharing platforms: Instagram, Flickr), and it’s become difficult to truly enjoy now. We are so focused on the next entertainment, the next post, The next dopamine hit.
I think, focus, you may feel a little tired. Maybe you choose to wait for your photos to escape the happy tyranny and free yourself from the torment of everyday novelties that threaten the eternal scrolling of news sources or bottomless pits of search results. The speed at which we now produce and access images is inherently burdensome. The responsibility of checking, editing, and sharing the photos you take immediately often prevents you from fully experiencing the beautiful moments that may be enough to capture.
Traditionally, even those innovations aimed at accelerating the pace of life have brought unexpected leisure. The one-hour photo studio creates an awkward time interval, which is too short for many errands, and some customers may fill it by strolling in the town or smoking a cigarette in the park. MP3 introduces a 5-minute download window (can we wait so long to download the music?) During this time you can write an email or make a cup of coffee. Author Douglas Coupland (Douglas Coupland) once wrote “Time Snacks”, that is, “pseudo-leisure” moments created when the computer stops responding. Over the years, our snacks have become less and less, reduced to the fleeting time when we look away from the screen and wait for a page refresh or application download, although the relief is still obvious. The beauty of these moments is different from the relief we feel when a snowstorm or heavy rain stops life, makes us helpless, and allows us to remain still. The delay imposed by your camera application is an attempt to capture and prolong those moments that are forced to be lazy-arguably “anti-corrosion” them.